<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FILM ANTHROPOLOGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>THE SCIENCE OF MOTION PICTURE ART</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE SPACESHIP &#124; Production Diary 8: Camera &amp; Workflow Test by Film Anthropology</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/03/13/spaceship8/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Film Anthropology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1254#comment-412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for taking the time to give me more than a thoughtful answer! Yeah, I hadn&#039;t taken into consideration how lenses and sensors work and what not - but it makes sense as I continued reading into it later on.  Don&#039;t worry about rambling - you should hear me talk sometimes. lol

Keep following - lots of awesome stuff happening!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to give me more than a thoughtful answer! Yeah, I hadn&#8217;t taken into consideration how lenses and sensors work and what not &#8211; but it makes sense as I continued reading into it later on.  Don&#8217;t worry about rambling &#8211; you should hear me talk sometimes. lol</p>
<p>Keep following &#8211; lots of awesome stuff happening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE SPACESHIP &#124; Production Diary 8: Camera &amp; Workflow Test by NJSW.DP</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/03/13/spaceship8/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NJSW.DP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1254#comment-410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case this helps:

The mirror is out of focus because the combined distance of the man on the bed over to the mirror plus the distance from the mirror over to the lens is beyond the depth of field created by the parameters of the optical setup: the focal length of the lens and the aperture used.  In other words, that lens, at that t-stop will only see point A in the foreground to point B in the background as in focus.  The RED Epic, and no camera for that matter, will ever &quot;see&quot; it as a mirror and treat it differently.  I am afraid that is just an incorrect misconception.  It is simply a matter or rays of light bouncing off a reflective surface and therefore travelling further to reach the lens.  It is the lens that does all the work.

Your split-screen idea is certainly the front-runner for ideas to solve this predicament, but here are a couple other ways you can ensure both the man and woman are in focus:

1) Increasing the t-stop to increase the depth of field so it extends as far as the bed.  The cost of this is that more light will be needed and not all lenses work their best at high t-stops.

2) Using a split-field diopter filter (for example: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41JQS3C4XML._SL500_SS500_.jpg).  You can effectively change the optical setup for one side of the frame so that both sides will be in focus on the camera&#039;s sensor.  A famous use of this was in All The President&#039;s Men (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-hS99thMfFBs/TabIe6HsCgI/AAAAAAAACeo/oA2WA1oibcE/s1600/atpm.jpg) whereby the television set on the left is kept in focus while Bob Woodward (Robert Redford) works in the background.  The difficulty of this is in successfully hiding the center edge of the filter to a natural edge in the set.

Then again, there is always an argument to say &quot;why do we need both in focus?&quot;.  There may be strong support to, let&#039;s say, leave the man out of focus if all we want the audience to do is focus on the woman and her reactions.  If we can hear his lines and the visual narrative is more about how she feels, then I would advise my director is leave him out of focus.

The human eye is naturally attracted to brightness, contrast, movement and focus, and as Directors and DP&#039;s we wield this tool to play visual psychology on our audience.  By directing the audience to gaze upon an actor/actress for a purposeful length of time, allows the audience to emotively connect.

Anyway, I am rambling now - I apologise.  It honestly depends on the tone of that moment in the script.  Best of luck with the shoot.  I have had the pleasure of working with Lauren before and I think she&#039;s great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case this helps:</p>
<p>The mirror is out of focus because the combined distance of the man on the bed over to the mirror plus the distance from the mirror over to the lens is beyond the depth of field created by the parameters of the optical setup: the focal length of the lens and the aperture used.  In other words, that lens, at that t-stop will only see point A in the foreground to point B in the background as in focus.  The RED Epic, and no camera for that matter, will ever &#8220;see&#8221; it as a mirror and treat it differently.  I am afraid that is just an incorrect misconception.  It is simply a matter or rays of light bouncing off a reflective surface and therefore travelling further to reach the lens.  It is the lens that does all the work.</p>
<p>Your split-screen idea is certainly the front-runner for ideas to solve this predicament, but here are a couple other ways you can ensure both the man and woman are in focus:</p>
<p>1) Increasing the t-stop to increase the depth of field so it extends as far as the bed.  The cost of this is that more light will be needed and not all lenses work their best at high t-stops.</p>
<p>2) Using a split-field diopter filter (for example: <a href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41JQS3C4XML._SL500_SS500_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41JQS3C4XML._SL500_SS500_.jpg</a>).  You can effectively change the optical setup for one side of the frame so that both sides will be in focus on the camera&#8217;s sensor.  A famous use of this was in All The President&#8217;s Men (<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-hS99thMfFBs/TabIe6HsCgI/AAAAAAAACeo/oA2WA1oibcE/s1600/atpm.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-hS99thMfFBs/TabIe6HsCgI/AAAAAAAACeo/oA2WA1oibcE/s1600/atpm.jpg</a>) whereby the television set on the left is kept in focus while Bob Woodward (Robert Redford) works in the background.  The difficulty of this is in successfully hiding the center edge of the filter to a natural edge in the set.</p>
<p>Then again, there is always an argument to say &#8220;why do we need both in focus?&#8221;.  There may be strong support to, let&#8217;s say, leave the man out of focus if all we want the audience to do is focus on the woman and her reactions.  If we can hear his lines and the visual narrative is more about how she feels, then I would advise my director is leave him out of focus.</p>
<p>The human eye is naturally attracted to brightness, contrast, movement and focus, and as Directors and DP&#8217;s we wield this tool to play visual psychology on our audience.  By directing the audience to gaze upon an actor/actress for a purposeful length of time, allows the audience to emotively connect.</p>
<p>Anyway, I am rambling now &#8211; I apologise.  It honestly depends on the tone of that moment in the script.  Best of luck with the shoot.  I have had the pleasure of working with Lauren before and I think she&#8217;s great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE SPACESHIP &#124; Production Diary by Eric M. Norcross Entry 9: Character Building by Jonathon</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/spaceship9characterbuilding/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1268#comment-408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate theview you have regarding the subtle aspects that make people behave the way they do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate theview you have regarding the subtle aspects that make people behave the way they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE SPACESHIP &#124; PRODUCTION DIARY 5 by tldarkroom</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/the-spaceship-production-diary-5/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tldarkroom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1229#comment-387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds pretty interesting dude - looking forward to seeing the final production.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds pretty interesting dude &#8211; looking forward to seeing the final production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Art Gallery Opening: BELOW SEE LEVEL by THE SPACESHIP &#124; PRODUCTION DIARY 5 &#124; FILM ANTHROPOLOGY</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/art-gallery-opening-below-see-level/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE SPACESHIP &#124; PRODUCTION DIARY 5 &#124; FILM ANTHROPOLOGY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1064#comment-385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to the creation of props.  He&#8217;s quite a talented guy and I&#8217;ve done a few write-ups on Film Anthropology and one write-up on TimesSquare.com about his work as an artist and a filmmaker.  One of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the creation of props.  He&#8217;s quite a talented guy and I&#8217;ve done a few write-ups on Film Anthropology and one write-up on TimesSquare.com about his work as an artist and a filmmaker.  One of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflecting Back: Sixteen Stories by David Nichols</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/reflecting-back-sixteen-stories/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Nichols]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1193#comment-372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW! Brings back memories. Thanks for sharing your reflections. David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! Brings back memories. Thanks for sharing your reflections. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Relationships with Film Festivals by tldarkroom</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/building-relationships-with-film-festivals/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tldarkroom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1179#comment-368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks! I&#039;m glad you like them. Plenty of colors along Rock Creek Parkway, kinda reminds me of Rivendell from Lord of the Rings lol. And yea of course, I&#039;d definitely be interested in writing about that - thanks for asking. Should I email you at the email listed on your FB page? Mine is tldarkroom@gmail.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;m glad you like them. Plenty of colors along Rock Creek Parkway, kinda reminds me of Rivendell from Lord of the Rings lol. And yea of course, I&#8217;d definitely be interested in writing about that &#8211; thanks for asking. Should I email you at the email listed on your FB page? Mine is <a href="mailto:tldarkroom@gmail.com">tldarkroom@gmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Relationships with Film Festivals by Eric Norcross</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/building-relationships-with-film-festivals/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Norcross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1179#comment-367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I enjoyed looking at the photos on your FB page. You do good work! Love the browns and the contrast with the greens of the Rock Creek Parkway image. If you ever want to write about your work or your experience as a photographer/filmmaker in the Washington, DC area - your experience would be of value a lot of filmmakers. Give me a shout if you&#039;re interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I enjoyed looking at the photos on your FB page. You do good work! Love the browns and the contrast with the greens of the Rock Creek Parkway image. If you ever want to write about your work or your experience as a photographer/filmmaker in the Washington, DC area &#8211; your experience would be of value a lot of filmmakers. Give me a shout if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Relationships with Film Festivals by tldarkroom</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/building-relationships-with-film-festivals/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tldarkroom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1179#comment-366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m new to the whole film festival game so your blog post was a nice way to familiarize myself a bit with how it all works. Makes sense...can&#039;t afford to ignore the smaller festivals just because you &#039;make it big&#039;, relatively speaking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new to the whole film festival game so your blog post was a nice way to familiarize myself a bit with how it all works. Makes sense&#8230;can&#8217;t afford to ignore the smaller festivals just because you &#8216;make it big&#8217;, relatively speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To: Identify Your Shooting Style by talkingbouttheblues</title>
		<link>http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/how-to-identify-your-shooting-style/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[talkingbouttheblues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 03:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norcrossmedia.wordpress.com/?p=1022#comment-311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingbouttheblues.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/624/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talkingbouttheblues&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
Wanted to share with you guys the article I wrote for Film Anthropology]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://talkingbouttheblues.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/624/" rel="nofollow">talkingbouttheblues</a> and commented:<br />
Wanted to share with you guys the article I wrote for Film Anthropology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
